Vtoman FlashSpeed 1500 vs Anker PowerHouse 767
Quick Verdict
We are putting the Vtoman FlashSpeed 1500 head-to-head against the Anker PowerHouse 767. The Anker PowerHouse 767 takes the lead in capacity with 2048Wh, surpassing the Vtoman FlashSpeed 1500's 1548Wh. The Anker PowerHouse 767 is the stronger unit here, pushing 2400W vs 1500W. Click the buttons below to check for the latest deals.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | Vtoman FlashSpeed 1500 | Anker PowerHouse 767 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 1500 W | 2400 W |
| Battery Size | 1548 Wh | 2048 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 3000 W | 3200 W |
| Charge Time | 1 | 1.9 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 4 | 2.5 |
| Charge Time (Car) | 13 | 19.6 |
| Solar Input (Max) | 400 W | 1000 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 12 W | 12 W |
| Ac Ports | 3 | 4 |
| Usb-C Ports | 2 | 3 |
| Usb Ports | 4 | 2 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 2 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 0 | 1 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 18.82 kg | 30.50 kg |
| Volume | 29526.212 | 51843.75 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 266.7 | 250 |
| Height | 279.4 | 395 |
| Width | 396.24 | 525 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | No |
| Lifecycle | 3100 | 3000 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | 20 | 20 |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | Yes |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | No | Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi | No | No |
| Has Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Warranty Period | N/A | 5 |