Fossibot F800 vs ETaker M2000
Quick Verdict
This comparison highlights the key differences between the Fossibot F800 and ETaker M2000. If battery size is your priority, the ETaker M2000 is the better choice with 1496Wh more capacity. The ETaker M2000 is the stronger unit here, pushing 2000W vs 800W. Review the detailed specs table below for a full breakdown.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | Fossibot F800 | ETaker M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 800 W | 2000 W |
| Battery Size | 512 Wh | 2008 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 1600 W | 4000 W |
| Charge Time | 1.5 | 2 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Charge Time (Car) | 4.5 | N/A |
| Solar Input (Max) | 200 W | 1000 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 8 W | 15 W |
| Ac Ports | 1 | 6 |
| Usb-C Ports | 3 | 2 |
| Usb Ports | 2 | 4 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 0 | 0 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 6.50 kg | 17.00 kg |
| Volume | 13267.32 | 19783.44 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 230 | 355 |
| Height | 276 | 258 |
| Width | 209 | 216 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | No | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | No |
| Lifecycle | N/A | 2000 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | N/A | 20 |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | Yes |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | No | Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Has Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Warranty Period | 2 | 5 |