Fossibot F800 vs Anker PowerHouse 767
Quick Verdict
Deciding between the Fossibot F800 and the Anker PowerHouse 767 comes down to your specific power needs. The Anker PowerHouse 767 takes the lead in capacity with 2048Wh, surpassing the Fossibot F800's 512Wh. For high-wattage appliances, the Anker PowerHouse 767 is superior (2400W). Your choice depends on whether you value extra capacity or portability.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | Fossibot F800 | Anker PowerHouse 767 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 800 W | 2400 W |
| Battery Size | 512 Wh | 2048 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 1600 W | 3200 W |
| Charge Time | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Charge Time (Car) | 4.5 | 19.6 |
| Solar Input (Max) | 200 W | 1000 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 8 W | 12 W |
| Ac Ports | 1 | 4 |
| Usb-C Ports | 3 | 3 |
| Usb Ports | 2 | 2 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 2 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 0 | 1 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 6.50 kg | 30.50 kg |
| Volume | 13267.32 | 51843.75 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 230 | 250 |
| Height | 276 | 395 |
| Width | 209 | 525 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | No | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | No |
| Lifecycle | N/A | 3000 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | N/A | 20 |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | Yes |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | No | Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi | No | No |
| Has Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Warranty Period | 2 | 5 |