Fossibot F800 vs Ampace Andes 300
Quick Verdict
Deciding between the Fossibot F800 and the Ampace Andes 300 comes down to your specific power needs. The Fossibot F800 has a distinct advantage in capacity, offering 512Wh versus the 266Wh found in the Ampace Andes 300. You can run larger appliances on the Fossibot F800 thanks to its higher 800W rating. Your choice depends on whether you value extra capacity or portability.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | Fossibot F800 | Ampace Andes 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 800 W | 300 W |
| Battery Size | 512 Wh | 266 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 1600 W | N/A |
| Charge Time | 1.5 | 1 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 2.5 | 2.6 |
| Charge Time (Car) | 4.5 | 2.6 |
| Solar Input (Max) | 200 W | 100 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 8 W | 6 W |
| Ac Ports | 1 | 2 |
| Usb-C Ports | 3 | 1 |
| Usb Ports | 2 | 2 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 0 | 0 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 6.50 kg | 3.70 kg |
| Volume | 13267.32 | N/A |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 230 | N/A |
| Height | 276 | N/A |
| Width | 209 | N/A |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | No | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | No |
| Lifecycle | N/A | 2500 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | N/A | 20 |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | N/A |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | No | Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Has Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Warranty Period | 2 | 3 |