ETaker M2000 vs Vtoman Jump 600
Quick Verdict
We are putting the ETaker M2000 head-to-head against the Vtoman Jump 600. The ETaker M2000 has a distinct advantage in capacity, offering 2008Wh versus the 640Wh found in the Vtoman Jump 600. You can run larger appliances on the ETaker M2000 thanks to its higher 2000W rating. Check the current pricing below to see which offers better value today.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | ETaker M2000 | Vtoman Jump 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 2000 W | 600 W |
| Battery Size | 2008 Wh | 640 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 4000 W | 1200 W |
| Charge Time | 2 | N/A |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 2.5 | N/A |
| Charge Time (Car) | N/A | N/A |
| Solar Input (Max) | 1000 W | 100 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 15 W | 9 W |
| Ac Ports | 6 | 2 |
| Usb-C Ports | 2 | 1 |
| Usb Ports | 4 | 3 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 0 | 0 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 17.00 kg | 9.30 kg |
| Volume | 19783.44 | 12298 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 355 | 220 |
| Height | 258 | 215 |
| Width | 216 | 260 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | Yes | N/A |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | No |
| Lifecycle | 2000 | 3100 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | 20 | N/A |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | Yes |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | Yes | No |
| Supports Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Has Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Warranty Period | 5 | 2 |
| Release Date | N/A | N/A |