ETaker M2000 vs Vtoman FlashSpeed 1500

ETaker M2000

ETaker M2000

2008 Wh

Find Best Deal at Amazon
Vtoman FlashSpeed 1500

Vtoman FlashSpeed 1500

1548 Wh

Find Best Deal at Amazon

Quick Verdict

This comparison highlights the key differences between the ETaker M2000 and Vtoman FlashSpeed 1500. For longer runtimes, the ETaker M2000 wins with an extra 460Wh of battery life. You can run larger appliances on the ETaker M2000 thanks to its higher 2000W rating. Check the current pricing below to see which offers better value today.

Detailed Comparison

FeatureETaker M2000Vtoman FlashSpeed 1500
Power
Ac Output 2000 W 1500 W
Battery Size 2008 Wh 1548 Wh
Ac Output (Peak) 4000 W 3000 W
Charge Time 2 1
Charge Time (Solar) 2.5 4
Charge Time (Car) N/A 13
Solar Input (Max) 1000 W 400 W
Ports
Number Of Outputs (Total) 15 W 12 W
Ac Ports 6 3
Usb-C Ports 2 2
Usb Ports 4 4
Car Ports 1 1
Tt-30 Ports 0 0
Design
Weight 17.00 kg 18.82 kg
Volume 19783.44 29526.212
Has A Display Yes Yes
Has A Touch Screen No No
Has A Carry Handle Yes Yes
Thickness 355 266.7
Height 258 279.4
Width 216 396.24
Features
Has Ups Mode Yes Yes
Has A Wireless Charging Pad No No
Lifecycle 2000 3100
Ups Switchover Speed 20 20
Has An Led Light Yes Yes
Supports A Remote Smartphone Yes No
Supports Wi-Fi Yes No
Has Bluetooth Yes No
Warranty Period 5 N/A
Release Date N/A