ETaker M2000 vs Fossibot F3600
Quick Verdict
This comparison highlights the key differences between the ETaker M2000 and Fossibot F3600. If battery size is your priority, the Fossibot F3600 is the better choice with 1832Wh more capacity. For high-wattage appliances, the Fossibot F3600 is superior (3868W). Click the buttons below to check for the latest deals.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | ETaker M2000 | Fossibot F3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 2000 W | 3868 W |
| Battery Size | 2008 Wh | 3840 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 4000 W | 6600 W |
| Charge Time | 2 | 3 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Charge Time (Car) | N/A | N/A |
| Solar Input (Max) | 1000 W | 2000 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 15 W | 14 W |
| Ac Ports | 6 | 4 |
| Usb-C Ports | 2 | 4 |
| Usb Ports | 4 | 2 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 0 | 1 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 17.00 kg | 4.20 kg |
| Volume | 19783.44 | 92955.019 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 355 | 321 |
| Height | 258 | 475.5 |
| Width | 216 | 609 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | No |
| Lifecycle | 2000 | 6500 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | 20 | 10 |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | Yes |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | Yes | No |
| Supports Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Has Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Warranty Period | 5 | 2 |
| Release Date | N/A | |