ETaker M2000 vs EcoFlow River Max
Quick Verdict
This comparison highlights the key differences between the ETaker M2000 and EcoFlow River Max. The ETaker M2000 has a distinct advantage in capacity, offering 2008Wh versus the 576Wh found in the EcoFlow River Max. With 2000W of output, the ETaker M2000 outmuscles the EcoFlow River Max. Your choice depends on whether you value extra capacity or portability.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | ETaker M2000 | EcoFlow River Max |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 2000 W | 600 W |
| Battery Size | 2008 Wh | 576 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 4000 W | 1200 W |
| Charge Time | 2 | 1.6 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 2.5 | 3 |
| Charge Time (Car) | N/A | 6.5 |
| Solar Input (Max) | 1000 W | 200 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 15 W | 10 W |
| Ac Ports | 6 | 3 |
| Usb-C Ports | 2 | 1 |
| Usb Ports | 4 | 3 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 0 | 0 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 17.00 kg | 8.00 kg |
| Volume | 19783.44 | 12496.36 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 355 | 184 |
| Height | 258 | 235 |
| Width | 216 | 289 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | No |
| Lifecycle | 2000 | 500 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | 20 | 30 |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | Yes |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | Yes | Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Has Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Warranty Period | 5 | 2 |
| Release Date | N/A | |