ETaker M2000 vs EcoFlow River 3
Quick Verdict
This comparison highlights the key differences between the ETaker M2000 and EcoFlow River 3. The ETaker M2000 has a distinct advantage in capacity, offering 2008Wh versus the 245Wh found in the EcoFlow River 3. The ETaker M2000 is also more powerful, capable of 2000W AC output compared to 300W. Check the current pricing below to see which offers better value today.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | ETaker M2000 | EcoFlow River 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 2000 W | 300 W |
| Battery Size | 2008 Wh | 245 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 4000 W | 600 W |
| Charge Time | 2 | 1 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 2.5 | 2.6 |
| Charge Time (Car) | N/A | 2.8 |
| Solar Input (Max) | 1000 W | 110 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 15 W | 6 W |
| Ac Ports | 6 | 2 |
| Usb-C Ports | 2 | 1 |
| Usb Ports | 4 | 2 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 0 | 0 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 17.00 kg | 3.50 kg |
| Volume | 19783.44 | 6108.78 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 355 | 212 |
| Height | 258 | 113 |
| Width | 216 | 255 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | No |
| Lifecycle | 2000 | 3000 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | 20 | 20 |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | Yes |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | Yes | Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Has Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty Period | 5 | N/A |
| Release Date | N/A | |