ETaker M2000 vs Anker Solix F3800
Quick Verdict
Should you buy the ETaker M2000 or the Anker Solix F3800? Let's look at the specs. The Anker Solix F3800 takes the lead in capacity with 3840Wh, surpassing the ETaker M2000's 2008Wh. The Anker Solix F3800 is the stronger unit here, pushing 6000W vs 2000W. Click the buttons below to check for the latest deals.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | ETaker M2000 | Anker Solix F3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 2000 W | 6000 W |
| Battery Size | 2008 Wh | 3840 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 4000 W | 9000 W |
| Charge Time | 2 | 2.7 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 2.5 | 2 |
| Charge Time (Car) | N/A | N/A |
| Solar Input (Max) | 1000 W | 2400 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 15 W | 14 W |
| Ac Ports | 6 | 6 |
| Usb-C Ports | 2 | 3 |
| Usb Ports | 4 | 2 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 0 | 1 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 17.00 kg | 60.00 kg |
| Volume | 19783.44 | 99480.42 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 355 | 383 |
| Height | 258 | 702 |
| Width | 216 | 370 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | No |
| Lifecycle | 2000 | 3000 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | 20 | N/A |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | Yes |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | Yes | Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Has Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty Period | 5 | 5 |
| Release Date | N/A | |