ETaker M2000 vs Anker Solix C800
Quick Verdict
Deciding between the ETaker M2000 and the Anker Solix C800 comes down to your specific power needs. The ETaker M2000 has a distinct advantage in capacity, offering 2008Wh versus the 768Wh found in the Anker Solix C800. With 2000W of output, the ETaker M2000 outmuscles the Anker Solix C800. Review the detailed specs table below for a full breakdown.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | ETaker M2000 | Anker Solix C800 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 2000 W | 1200 W |
| Battery Size | 2008 Wh | 768 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 4000 W | 1600 W |
| Charge Time | 2 | N/A |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 2.5 | N/A |
| Charge Time (Car) | N/A | N/A |
| Solar Input (Max) | 1000 W | 300 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 15 W | 10 W |
| Ac Ports | 6 | 5 |
| Usb-C Ports | 2 | 2 |
| Usb Ports | 4 | 2 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 0 | 0 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 17.00 kg | 10.50 kg |
| Volume | 19783.44 | 19013.75 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 355 | 205 |
| Height | 258 | 371 |
| Width | 216 | 250 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | No |
| Lifecycle | 2000 | 3000 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | 20 | 20 |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | Yes |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | Yes | Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Has Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty Period | 5 | 5 |
| Release Date | N/A | |