ETaker M2000 vs Anker PowerHouse 767
Quick Verdict
This comparison highlights the key differences between the ETaker M2000 and Anker PowerHouse 767. The Anker PowerHouse 767 lasts longer thanks to its larger 2048Wh battery. For high-wattage appliances, the Anker PowerHouse 767 is superior (2400W). Your choice depends on whether you value extra capacity or portability.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | ETaker M2000 | Anker PowerHouse 767 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 2000 W | 2400 W |
| Battery Size | 2008 Wh | 2048 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 4000 W | 3200 W |
| Charge Time | 2 | 1.9 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Charge Time (Car) | N/A | 19.6 |
| Solar Input (Max) | 1000 W | 1000 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 15 W | 12 W |
| Ac Ports | 6 | 4 |
| Usb-C Ports | 2 | 3 |
| Usb Ports | 4 | 2 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 2 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 0 | 1 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 17.00 kg | 30.50 kg |
| Volume | 19783.44 | 51843.75 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 355 | 250 |
| Height | 258 | 395 |
| Width | 216 | 525 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | No |
| Lifecycle | 2000 | 3000 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | 20 | 20 |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | Yes |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | Yes | Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Has Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty Period | 5 | 5 |
| Release Date | N/A | |