ETaker M2000 vs Ampace Andes 300
Quick Verdict
Deciding between the ETaker M2000 and the Ampace Andes 300 comes down to your specific power needs. The ETaker M2000 has a distinct advantage in capacity, offering 2008Wh versus the 266Wh found in the Ampace Andes 300. The ETaker M2000 is also more powerful, capable of 2000W AC output compared to 300W. Click the buttons below to check for the latest deals.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | ETaker M2000 | Ampace Andes 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 2000 W | 300 W |
| Battery Size | 2008 Wh | 266 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 4000 W | N/A |
| Charge Time | 2 | 1 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 2.5 | 2.6 |
| Charge Time (Car) | N/A | 2.6 |
| Solar Input (Max) | 1000 W | 100 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 15 W | 6 W |
| Ac Ports | 6 | 2 |
| Usb-C Ports | 2 | 1 |
| Usb Ports | 4 | 2 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 0 | 0 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 17.00 kg | 3.70 kg |
| Volume | 19783.44 | N/A |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 355 | N/A |
| Height | 258 | N/A |
| Width | 216 | N/A |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | No |
| Lifecycle | 2000 | 2500 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | 20 | 20 |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | N/A |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | Yes | Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Has Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty Period | 5 | 3 |
| Release Date | N/A | N/A |