EcoFlow River 3 vs ETaker M2000
Quick Verdict
We are putting the EcoFlow River 3 head-to-head against the ETaker M2000. The ETaker M2000 takes the lead in capacity with 2008Wh, surpassing the EcoFlow River 3's 245Wh. For high-wattage appliances, the ETaker M2000 is superior (2000W). Your choice depends on whether you value extra capacity or portability.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | EcoFlow River 3 | ETaker M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 300 W | 2000 W |
| Battery Size | 245 Wh | 2008 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 600 W | 4000 W |
| Charge Time | 1 | 2 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 2.6 | 2.5 |
| Charge Time (Car) | 2.8 | N/A |
| Solar Input (Max) | 110 W | 1000 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 6 W | 15 W |
| Ac Ports | 2 | 6 |
| Usb-C Ports | 1 | 2 |
| Usb Ports | 2 | 4 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 0 | 0 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 3.50 kg | 17.00 kg |
| Volume | 6108.78 | 19783.44 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 212 | 355 |
| Height | 113 | 258 |
| Width | 255 | 216 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | No |
| Lifecycle | 3000 | 2000 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | 20 | 20 |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | Yes |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | Yes | Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Has Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty Period | N/A | 5 |