Bluetti EB3A vs Anker Solix F3800
Quick Verdict
This comparison highlights the key differences between the Bluetti EB3A and Anker Solix F3800. The Anker Solix F3800 takes the lead in capacity with 3840Wh, surpassing the Bluetti EB3A's 268.8Wh. The Anker Solix F3800 is the stronger unit here, pushing 6000W vs 600W. Your choice depends on whether you value extra capacity or portability.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | Bluetti EB3A | Anker Solix F3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 600 W | 6000 W |
| Battery Size | 268.8 Wh | 3840 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 1200 W | 9000 W |
| Charge Time | 2 | 2.7 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 2 | 2 |
| Charge Time (Car) | 3.3 | N/A |
| Solar Input (Max) | 200 W | 2400 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 9 W | 14 W |
| Ac Ports | 2 | 6 |
| Usb-C Ports | 1 | 3 |
| Usb Ports | 2 | 2 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 0 | 1 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 4.60 kg | 60.00 kg |
| Volume | 8399.7 | 99480.42 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 183 | 383 |
| Height | 180 | 702 |
| Width | 255 | 370 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | Yes | No |
| Lifecycle | 2500 | 3000 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | 20 | N/A |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | Yes |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | Yes | Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Has Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty Period | 2 | 5 |