Bluetti EB3A vs Anker Solix F2000
Quick Verdict
This comparison highlights the key differences between the Bluetti EB3A and Anker Solix F2000. The Anker Solix F2000 takes the lead in capacity with 2048Wh, surpassing the Bluetti EB3A's 268.8Wh. The Anker Solix F2000 is the stronger unit here, pushing 2400W vs 600W. Check the current pricing below to see which offers better value today.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | Bluetti EB3A | Anker Solix F2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 600 W | 2400 W |
| Battery Size | 268.8 Wh | 2048 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 1200 W | 2800 W |
| Charge Time | 2 | N/A |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 2 | N/A |
| Charge Time (Car) | 3.3 | N/A |
| Solar Input (Max) | 200 W | 1000 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 9 W | 12 W |
| Ac Ports | 2 | 4 |
| Usb-C Ports | 1 | 3 |
| Usb Ports | 2 | 2 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 2 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 0 | 1 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 4.60 kg | 30.50 kg |
| Volume | 8399.7 | 51843.75 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 183 | 525 |
| Height | 180 | 250 |
| Width | 255 | 395 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | Yes | N/A |
| Lifecycle | 2500 | 3000 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | 20 | 20 |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | Yes |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | Yes | Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Has Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty Period | 2 | 5 |