Bluetti EB3A vs Anker Solix C200 DC
Quick Verdict
We are putting the Bluetti EB3A head-to-head against the Anker Solix C200 DC. For longer runtimes, the Bluetti EB3A wins with an extra 76.80000000000001Wh of battery life. You can run larger appliances on the Bluetti EB3A thanks to its higher 600W rating. Check the current pricing below to see which offers better value today.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | Bluetti EB3A | Anker Solix C200 DC |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 600 W | 200 W |
| Battery Size | 268.8 Wh | 192 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 1200 W | N/A |
| Charge Time | 2 | N/A |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 2 | N/A |
| Charge Time (Car) | 3.3 | N/A |
| Solar Input (Max) | 200 W | 100 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 9 W | 5 W |
| Ac Ports | 2 | 0 |
| Usb-C Ports | 1 | 3 |
| Usb Ports | 2 | 2 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 0 | 0 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 4.60 kg | 1.90 kg |
| Volume | 8399.7 | 2035 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 183 | 100 |
| Height | 180 | 185 |
| Width | 255 | 110 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | Yes | No |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | Yes | No |
| Lifecycle | 2500 | 3000 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | 20 | N/A |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | No |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | Yes | Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Has Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty Period | 2 | 3 |