Bluetti AC240 vs Ampace Andes 300
Quick Verdict
Deciding between the Bluetti AC240 and the Ampace Andes 300 comes down to your specific power needs. The Bluetti AC240 has a distinct advantage in capacity, offering 1536Wh versus the 266Wh found in the Ampace Andes 300. With 2400W of output, the Bluetti AC240 outmuscles the Ampace Andes 300. Your choice depends on whether you value extra capacity or portability.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | Bluetti AC240 | Ampace Andes 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 2400 W | 300 W |
| Battery Size | 1536 Wh | 266 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 3600 W | N/A |
| Charge Time | N/A | 1 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | N/A | 2.6 |
| Charge Time (Car) | 7.3 | 2.6 |
| Solar Input (Max) | 1200 W | 100 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 9 W | 6 W |
| Ac Ports | 2 | 2 |
| Usb-C Ports | 2 | 1 |
| Usb Ports | 2 | 2 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 1 | 0 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 33.00 kg | 3.70 kg |
| Volume | 50626.8 | N/A |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 410 | N/A |
| Height | 420 | N/A |
| Width | 294 | N/A |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | N/A | No |
| Lifecycle | 3500 | 2500 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | 15 | 20 |
| Has An Led Light | N/A | N/A |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | Yes | Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Has Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty Period | 6 | 3 |