Anker Solix F3800 vs Bluetti EB3A
Quick Verdict
We are putting the Anker Solix F3800 head-to-head against the Bluetti EB3A. The Anker Solix F3800 has a distinct advantage in capacity, offering 3840Wh versus the 268.8Wh found in the Bluetti EB3A. With 6000W of output, the Anker Solix F3800 outmuscles the Bluetti EB3A. Review the detailed specs table below for a full breakdown.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | Anker Solix F3800 | Bluetti EB3A |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 6000 W | 600 W |
| Battery Size | 3840 Wh | 268.8 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 9000 W | 1200 W |
| Charge Time | 2.7 | 2 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 2 | 2 |
| Charge Time (Car) | N/A | 3.3 |
| Solar Input (Max) | 2400 W | 200 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 14 W | 9 W |
| Ac Ports | 6 | 2 |
| Usb-C Ports | 3 | 1 |
| Usb Ports | 2 | 2 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 1 | 0 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 60.00 kg | 4.60 kg |
| Volume | 99480.42 | 8399.7 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 383 | 183 |
| Height | 702 | 180 |
| Width | 370 | 255 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | Yes |
| Lifecycle | 3000 | 2500 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | N/A | 20 |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | Yes |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | Yes | Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Has Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty Period | 5 | 2 |