Anker Solix F3800 vs Bluetti AC200P
Quick Verdict
This comparison highlights the key differences between the Anker Solix F3800 and Bluetti AC200P. The Anker Solix F3800 has a distinct advantage in capacity, offering 3840Wh versus the 2000Wh found in the Bluetti AC200P. The Anker Solix F3800 is also more powerful, capable of 6000W AC output compared to 2000W. Check the current pricing below to see which offers better value today.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | Anker Solix F3800 | Bluetti AC200P |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 6000 W | 2000 W |
| Battery Size | 3840 Wh | 2000 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 9000 W | 4800 W |
| Charge Time | 2.7 | 6 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 2 | 4 |
| Charge Time (Car) | N/A | 10 |
| Solar Input (Max) | 2400 W | 700 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 14 W | 17 W |
| Ac Ports | 6 | 6 |
| Usb-C Ports | 3 | 1 |
| Usb Ports | 2 | 4 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 1 | 0 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 60.00 kg | 27.50 kg |
| Volume | 99480.42 | 45452.4 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | Yes |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 383 | 386.5 |
| Height | 702 | 280 |
| Width | 370 | 420 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | Yes | No |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | Yes |
| Lifecycle | 3000 | 3500 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | N/A | N/A |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | No |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | Yes | No |
| Supports Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Has Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Warranty Period | 5 | 4 |