Anker Solix C300 vs Ugreen PowerRoam 2200
Quick Verdict
Deciding between the Anker Solix C300 and the Ugreen PowerRoam 2200 comes down to your specific power needs. The Ugreen PowerRoam 2200 takes the lead in capacity with 2048Wh, surpassing the Anker Solix C300's 288Wh. For high-wattage appliances, the Ugreen PowerRoam 2200 is superior (2400W). Check the current pricing below to see which offers better value today.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | Anker Solix C300 | Ugreen PowerRoam 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 300 W | 2400 W |
| Battery Size | 288 Wh | 2048 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 600 W | 3500 W |
| Charge Time | N/A | 1.5 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 3.13 | N/A |
| Charge Time (Car) | N/A | N/A |
| Solar Input (Max) | 100 W | 1200 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 8 W | 16 W |
| Ac Ports | 3 | 6 |
| Usb-C Ports | 3 | 4 |
| Usb Ports | 1 | 2 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 0 | 1 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 2.80 kg | 25.50 kg |
| Volume | 6336.96 | 39150 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 161 | 540 |
| Height | 240 | 290 |
| Width | 164 | 250 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | N/A | No |
| Lifecycle | 3000 | 3000 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | 10 | 20 |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | Yes |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | Yes | Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Has Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty Period | 5 | 5 |