Anker Solix C300 DC vs ETaker M2000
Quick Verdict
Should you buy the Anker Solix C300 DC or the ETaker M2000? Let's look at the specs. The ETaker M2000 takes the lead in capacity with 2008Wh, surpassing the Anker Solix C300 DC's 288Wh. However, the ETaker M2000 offers a higher output of 2000W compared to 300W. Check the current pricing below to see which offers better value today.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | Anker Solix C300 DC | ETaker M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 300 W | 2000 W |
| Battery Size | 288 Wh | 2008 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | N/A | 4000 W |
| Charge Time | N/A | 2 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | N/A | 2.5 |
| Charge Time (Car) | N/A | N/A |
| Solar Input (Max) | 100 W | 1000 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 7 W | 15 W |
| Ac Ports | 0 | 6 |
| Usb-C Ports | 4 | 2 |
| Usb Ports | 2 | 4 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 0 | 0 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 2.80 kg | 17.00 kg |
| Volume | 2879.8 | 19783.44 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 121 | 355 |
| Height | 200 | 258 |
| Width | 119 | 216 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | No | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | No |
| Lifecycle | N/A | 2000 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | N/A | 20 |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | Yes |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | Yes | Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Has Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty Period | 3 | 5 |