Anker Solix C300 DC vs Bluetti EB3A
Quick Verdict
Deciding between the Anker Solix C300 DC and the Bluetti EB3A comes down to your specific power needs. The Anker Solix C300 DC has a distinct advantage in capacity, offering 288Wh versus the 268.8Wh found in the Bluetti EB3A. The Bluetti EB3A is the stronger unit here, pushing 600W vs 300W. Check the current pricing below to see which offers better value today.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | Anker Solix C300 DC | Bluetti EB3A |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 300 W | 600 W |
| Battery Size | 288 Wh | 268.8 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | N/A | 1200 W |
| Charge Time | N/A | 2 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | N/A | 2 |
| Charge Time (Car) | N/A | 3.3 |
| Solar Input (Max) | 100 W | 200 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 7 W | 9 W |
| Ac Ports | 0 | 2 |
| Usb-C Ports | 4 | 1 |
| Usb Ports | 2 | 2 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 0 | 0 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 2.80 kg | 4.60 kg |
| Volume | 2879.8 | 8399.7 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 121 | 183 |
| Height | 200 | 180 |
| Width | 119 | 255 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | No | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | Yes |
| Lifecycle | N/A | 2500 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | N/A | 20 |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | Yes |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | Yes | Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Has Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty Period | 3 | 2 |