Anker Solix C200 DC vs ETaker M2000
Quick Verdict
This comparison highlights the key differences between the Anker Solix C200 DC and ETaker M2000. If battery size is your priority, the ETaker M2000 is the better choice with 1816Wh more capacity. However, the ETaker M2000 offers a higher output of 2000W compared to 200W. Review the detailed specs table below for a full breakdown.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | Anker Solix C200 DC | ETaker M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 200 W | 2000 W |
| Battery Size | 192 Wh | 2008 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | N/A | 4000 W |
| Charge Time | N/A | 2 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | N/A | 2.5 |
| Charge Time (Car) | N/A | N/A |
| Solar Input (Max) | 100 W | 1000 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 5 W | 15 W |
| Ac Ports | 0 | 6 |
| Usb-C Ports | 3 | 2 |
| Usb Ports | 2 | 4 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 0 | 0 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 1.90 kg | 17.00 kg |
| Volume | 2035 | 19783.44 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 100 | 355 |
| Height | 185 | 258 |
| Width | 110 | 216 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | No | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | No |
| Lifecycle | 3000 | 2000 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | N/A | 20 |
| Has An Led Light | No | Yes |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | Yes | Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Has Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty Period | 3 | 5 |