Anker Solix C200 DC vs Anker PowerHouse 767
Quick Verdict
We are putting the Anker Solix C200 DC head-to-head against the Anker PowerHouse 767. If battery size is your priority, the Anker PowerHouse 767 is the better choice with 1856Wh more capacity. For high-wattage appliances, the Anker PowerHouse 767 is superior (2400W). Review the detailed specs table below for a full breakdown.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | Anker Solix C200 DC | Anker PowerHouse 767 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 200 W | 2400 W |
| Battery Size | 192 Wh | 2048 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | N/A | 3200 W |
| Charge Time | N/A | 1.9 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | N/A | 2.5 |
| Charge Time (Car) | N/A | 19.6 |
| Solar Input (Max) | 100 W | 1000 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 5 W | 12 W |
| Ac Ports | 0 | 4 |
| Usb-C Ports | 3 | 3 |
| Usb Ports | 2 | 2 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 2 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 0 | 1 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 1.90 kg | 30.50 kg |
| Volume | 2035 | 51843.75 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 100 | 250 |
| Height | 185 | 395 |
| Width | 110 | 525 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | No | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | No |
| Lifecycle | 3000 | 3000 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | N/A | 20 |
| Has An Led Light | No | Yes |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | Yes | Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Has Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty Period | 3 | 5 |