Anker PowerHouse 767 vs Fossibot F3600
Quick Verdict
We are putting the Anker PowerHouse 767 head-to-head against the Fossibot F3600. If battery size is your priority, the Fossibot F3600 is the better choice with 1792Wh more capacity. For high-wattage appliances, the Fossibot F3600 is superior (3868W). Review the detailed specs table below for a full breakdown.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | Anker PowerHouse 767 | Fossibot F3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 2400 W | 3868 W |
| Battery Size | 2048 Wh | 3840 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 3200 W | 6600 W |
| Charge Time | 1.9 | 3 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Charge Time (Car) | 19.6 | N/A |
| Solar Input (Max) | 1000 W | 2000 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 12 W | 14 W |
| Ac Ports | 4 | 4 |
| Usb-C Ports | 3 | 4 |
| Usb Ports | 2 | 2 |
| Car Ports | 2 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 30.50 kg | 4.20 kg |
| Volume | 51843.75 | 92955.019 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 250 | 321 |
| Height | 395 | 475.5 |
| Width | 525 | 609 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | No |
| Lifecycle | 3000 | 6500 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | 20 | 10 |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | Yes |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | Yes | No |
| Supports Wi-Fi | No | No |
| Has Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Warranty Period | 5 | 2 |