Anker PowerHouse 767 vs ETaker M2000
Quick Verdict
This comparison highlights the key differences between the Anker PowerHouse 767 and ETaker M2000. The Anker PowerHouse 767 packs a larger battery (2048Wh) than the ETaker M2000. With 2400W of output, the Anker PowerHouse 767 outmuscles the ETaker M2000. Review the detailed specs table below for a full breakdown.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | Anker PowerHouse 767 | ETaker M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 2400 W | 2000 W |
| Battery Size | 2048 Wh | 2008 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 3200 W | 4000 W |
| Charge Time | 1.9 | 2 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Charge Time (Car) | 19.6 | N/A |
| Solar Input (Max) | 1000 W | 1000 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 12 W | 15 W |
| Ac Ports | 4 | 6 |
| Usb-C Ports | 3 | 2 |
| Usb Ports | 2 | 4 |
| Car Ports | 2 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 1 | 0 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 30.50 kg | 17.00 kg |
| Volume | 51843.75 | 19783.44 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 250 | 355 |
| Height | 395 | 258 |
| Width | 525 | 216 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | No |
| Lifecycle | 3000 | 2000 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | 20 | 20 |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | Yes |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | Yes | Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Has Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty Period | 5 | 5 |