Anker PowerHouse 767 vs Anker Solix C200 DC
Quick Verdict
We are putting the Anker PowerHouse 767 head-to-head against the Anker Solix C200 DC. The Anker PowerHouse 767 has a distinct advantage in capacity, offering 2048Wh versus the 192Wh found in the Anker Solix C200 DC. With 2400W of output, the Anker PowerHouse 767 outmuscles the Anker Solix C200 DC. Your choice depends on whether you value extra capacity or portability.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | Anker PowerHouse 767 | Anker Solix C200 DC |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 2400 W | 200 W |
| Battery Size | 2048 Wh | 192 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 3200 W | N/A |
| Charge Time | 1.9 | N/A |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 2.5 | N/A |
| Charge Time (Car) | 19.6 | N/A |
| Solar Input (Max) | 1000 W | 100 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 12 W | 5 W |
| Ac Ports | 4 | 0 |
| Usb-C Ports | 3 | 3 |
| Usb Ports | 2 | 2 |
| Car Ports | 2 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 1 | 0 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 30.50 kg | 1.90 kg |
| Volume | 51843.75 | 2035 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 250 | 100 |
| Height | 395 | 185 |
| Width | 525 | 110 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | Yes | No |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | No |
| Lifecycle | 3000 | 3000 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | 20 | N/A |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | No |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | Yes | Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Has Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty Period | 5 | 3 |