Anker PowerHouse 767 vs Ampace Andes 300
Quick Verdict
This comparison highlights the key differences between the Anker PowerHouse 767 and Ampace Andes 300. The Anker PowerHouse 767 has a distinct advantage in capacity, offering 2048Wh versus the 266Wh found in the Ampace Andes 300. With 2400W of output, the Anker PowerHouse 767 outmuscles the Ampace Andes 300. Review the detailed specs table below for a full breakdown.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | Anker PowerHouse 767 | Ampace Andes 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 2400 W | 300 W |
| Battery Size | 2048 Wh | 266 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 3200 W | N/A |
| Charge Time | 1.9 | 1 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 2.5 | 2.6 |
| Charge Time (Car) | 19.6 | 2.6 |
| Solar Input (Max) | 1000 W | 100 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 12 W | 6 W |
| Ac Ports | 4 | 2 |
| Usb-C Ports | 3 | 1 |
| Usb Ports | 2 | 2 |
| Car Ports | 2 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 1 | 0 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 30.50 kg | 3.70 kg |
| Volume | 51843.75 | N/A |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 250 | N/A |
| Height | 395 | N/A |
| Width | 525 | N/A |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | No |
| Lifecycle | 3000 | 2500 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | 20 | 20 |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | N/A |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | Yes | Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Has Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty Period | 5 | 3 |