Anker PowerHouse 757 vs Fossibot F800
Quick Verdict
We are putting the Anker PowerHouse 757 head-to-head against the Fossibot F800. The Anker PowerHouse 757 has a distinct advantage in capacity, offering 1229Wh versus the 512Wh found in the Fossibot F800. The Anker PowerHouse 757 is also more powerful, capable of 2400W AC output compared to 800W. Your choice depends on whether you value extra capacity or portability.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | Anker PowerHouse 757 | Fossibot F800 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 2400 W | 800 W |
| Battery Size | 1229 Wh | 512 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 1500 W | 1600 W |
| Charge Time | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 4.5 | 2.5 |
| Charge Time (Car) | 13.8 | 4.5 |
| Solar Input (Max) | 300 W | 200 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 13 W | 8 W |
| Ac Ports | 6 | 1 |
| Usb-C Ports | 2 | 3 |
| Usb Ports | 4 | 2 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 0 | 0 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 1.99 kg | 6.50 kg |
| Volume | 31602.528 | 13267.32 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 237 | 230 |
| Height | 288 | 276 |
| Width | 463 | 209 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | Yes | No |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | No |
| Lifecycle | 3000 | N/A |
| Ups Switchover Speed | 20 | N/A |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | Yes |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | No | No |
| Supports Wi-Fi | No | No |
| Has Bluetooth | No | No |
| Warranty Period | 5 | 2 |