Anker PowerHouse 757 vs EcoFlow River 3
Quick Verdict
This comparison highlights the key differences between the Anker PowerHouse 757 and EcoFlow River 3. For longer runtimes, the Anker PowerHouse 757 wins with an extra 984Wh of battery life. With 2400W of output, the Anker PowerHouse 757 outmuscles the EcoFlow River 3. Review the detailed specs table below for a full breakdown.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | Anker PowerHouse 757 | EcoFlow River 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 2400 W | 300 W |
| Battery Size | 1229 Wh | 245 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | 1500 W | 600 W |
| Charge Time | 1.5 | 1 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 4.5 | 2.6 |
| Charge Time (Car) | 13.8 | 2.8 |
| Solar Input (Max) | 300 W | 110 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 13 W | 6 W |
| Ac Ports | 6 | 2 |
| Usb-C Ports | 2 | 1 |
| Usb Ports | 4 | 2 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 0 | 0 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 1.99 kg | 3.50 kg |
| Volume | 31602.528 | 6108.78 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | 237 | 212 |
| Height | 288 | 113 |
| Width | 463 | 255 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | No |
| Lifecycle | 3000 | 3000 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | 20 | 20 |
| Has An Led Light | Yes | Yes |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | No | Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Has Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Warranty Period | 5 | N/A |