Ampace Andes 300 vs Fossibot F3600
Quick Verdict
We are putting the Ampace Andes 300 head-to-head against the Fossibot F3600. If battery size is your priority, the Fossibot F3600 is the better choice with 3574Wh more capacity. However, the Fossibot F3600 offers a higher output of 3868W compared to 300W. Your choice depends on whether you value extra capacity or portability.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | Ampace Andes 300 | Fossibot F3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | ||
| Ac Output | 300 W | 3868 W |
| Battery Size | 266 Wh | 3840 Wh |
| Ac Output (Peak) | N/A | 6600 W |
| Charge Time | 1 | 3 |
| Charge Time (Solar) | 2.6 | 2.5 |
| Charge Time (Car) | 2.6 | N/A |
| Solar Input (Max) | 100 W | 2000 W |
| Ports | ||
| Number Of Outputs (Total) | 6 W | 14 W |
| Ac Ports | 2 | 4 |
| Usb-C Ports | 1 | 4 |
| Usb Ports | 2 | 2 |
| Car Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Tt-30 Ports | 0 | 1 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 3.70 kg | 4.20 kg |
| Volume | N/A | 92955.019 |
| Has A Display | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Touch Screen | No | No |
| Has A Carry Handle | Yes | Yes |
| Thickness | N/A | 321 |
| Height | N/A | 475.5 |
| Width | N/A | 609 |
| Features | ||
| Has Ups Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Has A Wireless Charging Pad | No | No |
| Lifecycle | 2500 | 6500 |
| Ups Switchover Speed | 20 | 10 |
| Has An Led Light | N/A | Yes |
| Supports A Remote Smartphone | Yes | No |
| Supports Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Has Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Warranty Period | 3 | 2 |
| Release Date | N/A | |